Contenu

Client Citation Analysis

Engineering Asymmetric Nanoscale Vesicles for mRNA and Protein Delivery to Cells

Chenjing Yang, Julian Menge, Nene Zhvania, Miao Yu, Hualiang Yang, Dong Chen, Zongli Zheng, David A. Weitz, Kevin Jahnke

At-a-Glance Summary

Primary surface measurement

Interfacial tension between mineral oil and PBS containing DODMA, EPC, POPC, and POPS lipid formulations, measured by pendant drop with Young–Laplace fitting. Data appear in Figure 3b–c.

Dropometer attribution in the paper

"Pendant drop method (Droplet Lab)" — Experimental Section. Lipid dissolved in mineral oil at 0.06 mM; oil droplet contour analysed with Young–Laplace fit.

How the data were used

To compare five conditions at the water/oil interface. A correlation was observed between lower interfacial tension and higher asymmetric vesicle yield, informing the formulation selected for drug delivery experiments.

Replication

Mean ± SD, n = 3 : consistent with standard pendant-drop methodology for lipid/oil systems.

Paper Details

Title
Engineering Asymmetric Nanoscale Vesicles for mRNA and Protein Delivery to Cells
Authors
Chenjing Yang, Julian Menge, Nene Zhvania, Miao Yu, Hualiang Yang, Dong Chen, Zongli Zheng, David A. Weitz, Kevin Jahnke
Journal
Advanced Functional Materials
Year / Volume
2025 · Vol. 35 · Article 2505738
License
© 2025 Wiley-VCH GmbH
26.6
CiteScore (Scopus 2024)
  • Q1 · Biomaterials & Nanotechnology
19.4
5-Year Impact Factor (JCR 2024)
  • Clarivate verified
19.0
Impact Factor (Clarivate JCR 2024)
  • Q1 · Physics, Applied · rank 9/187

What Was Measured

Pendant drop method (Droplet Lab) · Figure 3b–c

Interfacial tension between mineral oil and 1× PBS was measured for five conditions: DODMA, EPC, POPC, and POPS (each at 0.06 mM in mineral oil), plus a no-lipid baseline. An oil droplet was introduced into aqueous PBS; the droplet contour was imaged and fitted with the Young–Laplace equation to determine interfacial tension. Only DODMA carries an explicitly stated SD in the paper text (61.5 ± 3.5 mN/m); values for EPC, POPC, and POPS are read from Figure 3c error bars. Mean ± SD, n = 3.

Supporting measurements: other instruments in the study

ZetaSizer Nano ZS · Malvern

Hydrodynamic vesicle diameter by DLS (Figures 1b, 2c)

Zetasizer Pro · Malvern

Zeta potential, surface charge (Figures 2a–b, 2d)

LSM980 / LSM900 · Zeiss

Confocal microscopy: uptake, transfection, protein delivery (Figures 4–6)

FACSymphony A3 Lite · BD Biosciences

Flow cytometry: cellular uptake quantification (Figure 4b–c)

Tecan Spark · microplate reader

Fluorescence intensity: vesicle yield and concentration

BioTek Synergy H1

Laurdan fluorescence: membrane fluidity and vesicle stiffness (Figure S13)

CFX96 Touch · Bio-Rad

qRT-PCR: EGFR silencing by siRNA delivery (Figure S16)

NextSeq 1000 · Illumina

Next-generation sequencing: Cas9/sgRNA gene-editing efficiency

TEM (Figure S1)

Transmission electron microscopy: vesicle size validation alongside DLS

Role of the Dropometer

The Dropometer was used to measure interfacial tension between mineral oil and PBS solutions containing different lipid compositions. In the pendant drop workflow, lipid-containing mineral oil droplets were introduced into aqueous PBS using a syringe needle. The droplet contour was imaged and analysed with a Young–Laplace fit to determine interfacial tension. Five conditions were compared: DODMA, EPC, POPC, and POPS (each at 0.06 mM in mineral oil) and a no-lipid baseline.

The resulting interfacial tension values were used to identify a correlation between lipid-dependent interfacial behaviour and asymmetric vesicle yield during the inverted emulsion assembly process. POPS-containing systems, which showed the lowest interfacial tension, also produced the highest vesicle yields. The authors describe this as an observed correlation; the underlying mechanism was not mechanistically tested in this study.

Method Snapshot

Interfacial tension values (Figure 3c) reported in Yang et al. (2025) and reproduced here as factual data with attribution. All other values traceable to corresponding figures and methods sections in the paper.

System / Experiment Lipid / condition Measurement Output Instrument Conditions Notes
Interfacial tension — DODMA DODMA in mineral oil 61.5 ± 3.5 mN/m Pendant drop · Droplet Lab 0.06 mM; n = 3 Highest among lipid-containing systems; lowest vesicle yield. Only value with SD stated in paper text.
Interfacial tension — EPC EPC in mineral oil Approx. 25 mN/m (Figure 3c) Pendant drop · Droplet Lab 0.06 mM; n = 3 SD readable from Figure 3c error bars; not stated in text
Interfacial tension — POPC POPC in mineral oil Approx. 20 mN/m (Figure 3c) Pendant drop · Droplet Lab 0.06 mM; n = 3 SD readable from Figure 3c error bars; not stated in text
Interfacial tension — POPS POPS in mineral oil Approx. 12 mN/m (Figure 3c) Pendant drop · Droplet Lab 0.06 mM; n = 3 Lowest interfacial tension; correlated with highest vesicle yield. SD readable from Figure 3c.
Interfacial tension — no-lipid baseline Mineral oil / PBS only Approx. 50 mN/m (Figure 3c) Pendant drop · Droplet Lab No lipid; n = 3 Reference condition; highest value in the series
Vesicle asymmetry NBD-PE outer leaflet; dithionite quenching >90% asymmetry; stable to 22 days; ~35% flip-flop by day 30 Fluorescence quenching assay Triton X disruption control; n = 3 Figure 1c, 2d
Zeta potential — outer leaflet control POPC inner / EPC or POPS outer (0–100%) +50 mV (EPC) to −41 mV (POPS); inner leaflet changes produce no change Zetasizer Pro · Malvern n = 3; 20 readings per measurement Zeta potential set exclusively by outer leaflet (Figure 2a–b)
Cellular uptake POPC-POPC, POPS-POPS, POPC-POPS, POPS-POPC POPC-POPS ~2× higher than POPS-POPS; POPS-POPC ~4× lower than POPC-POPS Confocal + flow cytometry HEK293; 6 h; n > 15,300 cells Directionality of asymmetry matters, not just composition. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis confirmed (Figure 4)
mRNA transfection GFP mRNA; POPC-POPS vs POPS-POPS vs POPC-POPC POPC-POPS: 9× higher vs POPC-POPC; 7× higher vs POPS-POPS Confocal microscopy HEK293; 48 h; n = 3 Optimised commercial LNPs ~50% efficiency vs asymmetric vesicles in this study (Figure S17, Figure 5c)
Cytotoxicity POPC-POPS vs POPS-POPS POPC-POPS significantly lower LDH release despite higher uptake CyQUANT LDH assay · plate reader HEK293; 24 h; n = 3 triplicates Mechanism not elucidated (Figure 5d)
Protein delivery Streptavidin (60 kDa), IgG (150 kDa), Cas9-GFP (160 kDa), B-Phycoerythrin (240 kDa) Cytoplasmic protein presence confirmed; ~40% Cas9 nuclear localisation Confocal microscopy HEK293; EPC-POPS vesicles; n = 15 for nuclear quantification Cas9 carries NLS tag enabling nuclear targeting; IgG at similar MW does not localise to nucleus (Figure 6)
Gene editing EnGen Spy Cas9 NLS + sgRNA (TTR target); EPC-POPS vesicles 7% editing efficiency (HEK293); 9% (HeLa) Next-gen sequencing · Illumina NextSeq 1000; CRISPResso2 48 h; lipofectamine benchmark 82% NLS-tagged Cas9 (NEB EnGen Spy Cas9 NLS) used specifically to enable nuclear localisation. Proof-of-concept; large gap vs benchmark remains (Figure S21)
Vesicle size — pore size study POPC/POPS; 30, 100, 200 nm membranes 65 nm / 150 nm / 250 nm (hydrodynamic diameter) DLS · Malvern ZetaSizer Nano ZS; TEM (Figure S1) Polycarbonate membrane extrusion Size tuned by membrane pore diameter (Figure 1b); TEM confirms DLS

Key Findings

Lower interfacial tension correlated with higher vesicle yield

POPS produced the lowest interfacial tension (approx. 12 mN/m) and the highest asymmetric vesicle yield. The paper describes this as an observed correlation; the underlying mechanism was not mechanistically tested.

Leaflet directionality not just composition drives uptake

POPC-POPS vesicles showed approximately twofold higher uptake than symmetric POPS-POPS vesicles. Inverting the composition to POPS-POPC reduced uptake fourfold relative to POPC-POPS, showing that which lipid occupies which leaflet matters independently of overall lipid identity.

mRNA transfection improved substantially vs symmetric vesicles but not vs optimised LNPs

POPC-POPS vesicles achieved transfection rates 9× higher than POPC-POPC controls and 7× higher than POPS-POPS. Optimised commercial LNPs remain approximately 50% efficient against these vesicles in this study an important benchmark gap the authors acknowledge.

Cytotoxicity was lower despite higher uptake

POPC-POPS vesicles showed lower LDH-measured cytotoxicity than symmetric POPS-POPS vesicles. The authors hypothesise this reflects resemblance to the natural cell membrane, which contains PS in the inner leaflet, but the mechanism was not elucidated.

Functional protein and Cas9/sgRNA delivery demonstrated as proof-of-concept

Multiple proteins (60–240 kDa) were delivered to HEK293 cells with confirmed cytoplasmic release. NLS-tagged Cas9/sgRNA produced TTR gene edits in 7% of HEK293 and 9% of HeLa cells. The lipofectamine benchmark stands at 82% a gap the authors explicitly flag for future optimisation.

Figures & Visuals

Figures shown as reference thumbnails only. Full figures available at the publisher's page via DOI links below. © 2025 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Interfacial tension

Figure 3B-C

View At Publisher

Interfacial tension

Pendant drop workflow and interfacial tension values for five conditions: the Dropometer data.

Fabrication & asymmetry

Inverted emulsion workflow; vesicle asymmetry (>90%) and size control validated by DLS and dithionite quenching.

Cellular uptake

Confocal and flow cytometry comparison across four vesicle compositions including the inverted POPS-POPC condition.

mRNA transfection

GFP expression post mRNA delivery; transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity comparisons across vesicle types.

Limitations & Open questions

All limitations below are drawn directly from the authors' own discussion and conclusions.

Correlation without mechanism

The relationship between lower interfacial tension and higher vesicle yield is empirical. The paper notes this as "an interesting correlation" but does not propose or test a molecular mechanism.

Gene-editing efficiency gap

Cas9/sgRNA editing achieved 7–9% efficiency against lipofectamine's 82%. The authors explicitly flag this as a proof-of-concept result requiring further optimisation before clinical relevance.

No in vivo validation

All experiments were conducted in HEK293 and HeLa cell lines only. The authors identify targeting strategies and in vivo testing as necessary future steps.

Cytotoxicity mechanism unclear

The authors note reduced cytotoxicity for POPC-POPS and state it would be "particularly interesting to identify the exact molecular mechanisms" ; this remains an open question in the paper.

Transfection efficiency below LNP benchmark

Asymmetric vesicle mRNA transfection efficiency is lower than optimised commercial LNPs (~50% for LNPs vs the values reported here). The authors state further optimisation is needed and that LNPs offer less compositional flexibility by comparison.

What molecular properties of POPS drive the lower interfacial tension, and can this be leveraged predictively to design higher-yield lipid systems without empirical screening?

Does asymmetric leaflet composition affect endosomal escape efficiency independently of cellular uptake, and through what biophysical mechanism?

Can gene-editing efficiency be increased to clinically relevant levels through lipid composition optimisation alone, or are additional endosomal escape strategies required?

Do these results translate to primary cell types and in vivo systems, where serum protein adsorption and immune clearance will alter vesicle behaviour?

Practical Takeaways

Interfacial tension screens formulation candidates

Pendant-drop measurements can distinguish lipid systems before committing to full vesicle assembly runs, reducing wasted reagent and time at the formulation stage.

Outer leaflet alone sets surface charge

Zeta potential is controlled exclusively by the outer leaflet. Inner leaflet lipids can be varied independently to tune biophysical properties without changing surface charge.

Leaflet directionality is a design axis beyond composition

The same lipids arranged asymmetrically in opposite orientations produce fourfold differences in cellular uptake; a parameter unavailable in conventional symmetric vesicle systems.

Vesicle softness influences uptake independently

Shorter fatty acid chains produce softer, more fluid membranes with higher cellular uptake, suggesting membrane mechanics as an additional tuning lever beyond lipid identity.

Platform supports diverse cargo classes

The inverted emulsion method encapsulated mRNA, siRNA, and proteins from 60–240 kDa, including functional Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes.