Contenu

Construction Industrie
The Practical Guide to Surface Science (2026)

?s=100&d=m
Écrit par
No biography added yet.
Lire la suite
?s=100&d=m
Reviewed by
N/A
No biography added yet.
Lire la suite
?s=100&d=m
Written By

No biography added yet.

?s=100&d=m
Évalué par

N/A N/A

No biography added yet.

This is a practical guide to Surface Science for researchers working in the Construction Industry.

Dans ce tout nouveau guide, vous apprendrez tout sur :

  • Crucial surface science principles
  • The significance of surface science measurements for the Construction industry
  • Normes et directives ASTM applicables

Plongeons dans le vif du sujet.

construction

Executive Summary

What it covers: A practical surface-science playbook for construction researchers, explaining why surface properties matter for concrete and how to measure contact angle, surface tension (including dynamic), surface energy, and sliding angle to improve materials and coatings. It connects these measurements to real construction problems like corrosion risk, waterproofing, adhesion, and slip safety.
Key insights: Real construction surfaces rarely have a single “true” contact angle, so advancing/receding angles (hysteresis) provide a more complete picture of spreading, removability, cleanliness, roughness, and homogeneity than a single static value. Young–Laplace fitting is typically more consistent but prefers axisymmetric drops, while polynomial fits tolerate non-axisymmetry yet can be more sensitive to local imperfections; dynamic surface tension is critical when interfaces change fast (droplets/bubbles, foams, drying paints).
Business value: These measurements help engineers design lower-maintenance, higher-performance surfaces—e.g., self-cleaning solar panels via higher contact angle, better waterproofing via low-surface-tension membranes, and safer walkways via superhydrophobic/low-sliding-angle surfaces. They also reduce coating and bonding failures (steel–concrete composites, paint/pretreatments) by detecting incompatibility, contamination, and process drift before costly rework.
Standards to follow: EN 828:2013 outlines a repeatable method for assessing wettability and estimating surface free energy from static contact angles using one or more probe liquids to support bonding/coating readiness decisions. Follow its reporting discipline (substrate condition and time history, probe liquids/properties, droplet method/timepoint, replication and exclusions, and the SFE model/software used) and set acceptance thresholds only after correlating to your own bond-strength tests.
Bottom line: Surface science turns wetting, adhesion, waterproofing, and slip resistance from trial-and-error into measurable, controllable design inputs for modern construction materials. Use dynamic metrics when real surfaces and fast-changing interfaces demand them, and anchor QC decisions to EN 828-style documentation for reproducible, defensible results.

Chapitre 1 : Introduction

Concrete is the most widely used material in the global construction industry. It is cost-effective, offers high compressive strength, is durable, has a relatively simple production process, and requires minimal maintenance. Despite these advantages, concrete has a hydrophilic, porous structure that can pose challenges during construction. One major issue is the corrosion of steel reinforcement due to concrete’s water absorption, which reduces the lifespan of concrete structures. Additionally, there is a growing demand for intelligent, resilient, and sustainable buildings and infrastructures that focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. To meet these demands, new concrete materials such as low carbon footprint cement, self-compacting concrete, self-healing and self-sensing concrete, and superhydrophobic cementitious materials with self-cleaning capabilities have been developed. Modifying surface properties plays a crucial role in addressing the challenges of traditional concrete and in creating this new class of advanced materials.

We use the following surface properties to understand the behavior of Construction products and improve their quality.

Chapitre 2 : Mesure de l’angle de contact

L’angle de contact quantifie la mouillabilité d’une surface en représentant l’angle entre la surface d’un liquide et une surface solide.
Recherche Dropletlab

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer.

Young – Méthode Laplace

Méthode polynomiale

Angle de contact dynamique

Ideally, when we place a drop on a solid surface, a unique angle exists between the liquid and the solid surface. We can calculate the value of this ideal contact angle (the so-called Young’s contact angle) using Young’s equation. In practice, due to surface geometry, roughness, heterogeneity, contamination, and deformation, the contact angle value on a surface is not necessarily a single consistent value but rather falls within a range. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as the advancing and receding contact angles, respectively. The values of advancing and receding contact angles for a solid surface are highly sensitive to many parameters, such as temperature, humidity, homogeneity, and minor contamination of the surface and liquid. For example, the advancing and receding contact angles of a surface can differ at different locations.

Angle de contact dynamique par rapport à l’angle de contact statique

Les surfaces et les revêtements pratiques présentent naturellement une hystérésis d’angle de contact, indiquant une gamme de valeurs d’équilibre. Lorsque nous mesurons les angles de contact statiques, nous obtenons une seule valeur dans cette plage. S’appuyer uniquement sur des mesures statiques pose des problèmes, tels qu’une mauvaise répétabilité et une évaluation incomplète de la surface en ce qui concerne l’adhérence, la propreté, la rugosité et l’homogénéité.

In practical applications, we need to understand how easily a liquid spreads (advancing angle) and how easily it is removed (receding angle), such as in painting and cleaning. Measuring advancing and receding angles offers a holistic view of liquid-solid interaction, unlike static measurements, which yield an arbitrary value within the range.

Ces informations sont cruciales pour les surfaces du monde réel avec des variations, une rugosité et une dynamique, aidant des industries telles que les cosmétiques, la science des matériaux et la biotechnologie à concevoir des surfaces efficaces et à optimiser les processus.

Découvrez comment la mesure de l’angle de contact est effectuée sur notre tensiomètre

Pour une compréhension plus complète de la mesure de l’angle de contact, lisez notre mesure de l’angle de contact : le guide définitif

Open Benchmark Data: Contact Angle & Surface Energy

These reference measurements show how deionized water wets four standard substrates measured with the Droplet Lab Dropometer. Use them as visual and numerical benchmarks when you're checking your own sample preparation, treatments, and chemistry.

Full contact angle and surface energy datasets (including additional liquids and statistics) are available on our dataset hub.

Glass - DI Water
Glass - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water

The droplet images above are taken from the same benchmark series as our open dataset. For each substrate and probe liquid we report:

● Advancing and receding contact angles (and hysteresis)
● Derived surface energy (SFE) values based on multi-liquid measurements
● Measurement conditions, uncertainties, and sample preparation details

Comparing your own droplet shapes and angles against these references is a fast way to spot contamination, treatment drift, or unexpected changes in wettability.

Chapitre 3 : Mesure de la tension superficielle

Cette propriété mesure la force qui agit à la surface d’un liquide, dans le but de minimiser sa surface.

Mesure de la tension superficielle

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Tension superficielle dynamique

La tension superficielle dynamique diffère de la tension superficielle statique, qui fait référence à l’énergie de surface par unité de surface (ou à la force agissant par unité de longueur le long du bord d’une surface liquide).

La tension superficielle statique caractérise l’état d’équilibre de l’interface liquide, tandis que la tension superficielle dynamique tient compte de la cinétique des changements à l’interface. Ces changements peuvent impliquer la présence de tensioactifs, d’additifs ou de variations de température, de pression et de composition à l’interface.

Quand utiliser la mesure dynamique de la tension superficielle

Dynamic surface tension is essential for processes that involve rapid changes at the liquid-gas or liquid-liquid interface, such as droplet and bubble formation, coalescence (change in surface area), the behavior of foams, and the drying of paints (change in composition, e.g., evaporation of solvent). It is measured by analyzing the shape of a hanging droplet over time.

La tension superficielle dynamique s’applique à diverses industries, notamment les cosmétiques, les revêtements, les produits pharmaceutiques, la peinture, l’alimentation et les boissons, ainsi que les processus industriels, où la compréhension et le contrôle du comportement des interfaces liquides sont essentiels pour la qualité du produit et l’efficacité des processus.

Apprenez comment la mesure de la tension superficielle est effectuée sur notre tensiomètre

Pour une compréhension plus complète de la mesure de l’énergie de surface, lisez notre mesure de la tension superficielle : le guide définitif

Chapitre 4 : Mesure de l’énergie de surface

L’énergie de surface fait référence à l’énergie nécessaire pour créer une unité de surface d’une nouvelle surface.
231

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Découvrez comment la mesure de l’énergie de surface est effectuée sur notre tensiomètre

Pour une compréhension plus complète de la mesure de l’énergie de surface, lisez notre mesure de l’énergie de surface : le guide définitif

For benchmark contact angle and surface energy values on glass, nylon, PMMA, and Teflon, see the Open Benchmark Data panel above or visit our Dataset Hub for full CSV downloads.

Chapitre 5 : Mesure de l’angle de glissement

L’angle de glissement mesure l’angle auquel un film liquide glisse sur une surface solide. Il est couramment utilisé pour évaluer la résistance au glissement d’une surface.

Angle de glissement 1

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Apprenez comment la mesure de l’angle de glissement est effectuée sur notre tensiomètre

Pour une compréhension plus complète de la mesure de l’angle de glissement, lisez notre Mesure de l’angle de glissement : le guide définitif

Chapitre 6 : Applications dans le monde réel

Within the Construction industry, several case studies exemplify the advantages of conducting surface property measurements.

Deterioration of Solar Panels on a Rooftop

Défi : Dust and pollution accumulated on the solar panels of a commercial building, reducing their energy generation efficiency.

Solution : Applying a hydrophobic and oleophobic coating to the solar panels increased the contact angle, causing rainwater to bead up and carry away dust and pollutants. This self-cleaning effect improved energy generation efficiency and reduced maintenance costs.

Deterioration of Solar Panels on a Rooftop

Water Leakage in Underground Parking Structures

Défi : Water leakage in an underground parking structure was causing vehicle damage and structural deterioration.

Solution : A waterproofing membrane with low surface tension was applied to the concrete surfaces. This membrane provided effective water repellency, preventing water infiltration and preserving the integrity of the parking structure while protecting the vehicles.

Water Leakage in Underground Parking Structures

Trottoirs piétonniers glissants dans un centre commercial

Défi : Des allées piétonnes glissantes dans un centre commercial ont entraîné des accidents de glissade et de chute par temps de pluie.

Solution : The mall management installed textured, slip-resistant tiles with superhydrophobic surfaces. These tiles, characterized by a water static contact angle above 150° and a sliding angle below 10°, provided better traction even when wet, significantly reducing slip and fall incidents. This increased safety for shoppers and employees and decreased the mall's liability for accidents.

Trottoirs piétonniers glissants dans un centre commercial

Adhesion Problems in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures

Défi : Engineers faced adhesion problems between the steel and concrete components in a steel-concrete composite structure due to incompatible surface energies.

Solution : The engineering team applied a bonding agent to the steel beams to modify their surface energy. This agent enhanced compatibility between the steel and concrete, resulting in a robust bond. The composite structure exhibited improved load-bearing capacity and durability, ensuring the building's safety and longevity.

Adhesion Problems in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures

Paint Adhesion Issues on Metal Components

Défi : An automotive assembly plant experienced paint adhesion problems on metal components, leading to defects and reduced vehicle durability.

Solution : The engineering team improved paint adhesion by selecting a suitable metal pretreatment process. They tested various processes and chose plasma cleaning, which had the lowest surface tension. This solution ensured a durable, long-lasting finish on the vehicles.

Paint Adhesion Issues on Metal Components

Nous sommes vos partenaires dans la résolution de votre activité et de votre Défis

Si vous êtes intéressé par la mise en œuvre de ces applications ou de toute autre application, veuillez nous contacter.

Chapitre 7 : Normes et lignes directrices

In an industry where precision reigns supreme, how can Construction manufacturers ensure their products withstand scrutiny? The answer lies in standards and guidelines: the compass that guides them through the complex maze of quality and performance.

EN 828:2013 — Adhesives — Wettability by Contact Angle (Surface Free Energy of Solid Surfaces)

What it is

European standard method to determine a solid surface’s wettability and surface free energy (or critical surface tension) by measuring static contact angles of one or more probe liquids on a plane test surface. The resulting metrics support predictions of adhesive wet-out and help characterize surfaces before pretreatment, coating, or bonding.

When to use it

Ready-to-bond screening (before bond-strength testing):

Use contact angle + surface free energy to quickly flag low-wet-out substrates (metals, plastics, glass, coated parts) before you spend time on full lap-shear/peel trials.

Pretreatment/cleaning process control & troubleshooting:

Use repeatable, multi-liquid measurements to detect contamination, treatment drift (plasma/corona/flame/primer), and surface aging/recovery that can drive adhesion failures.

In-scope / Out-of-scope

In scope
  • Static sessile-drop contact angle measurements on plane test pieces/coupons with statistical interpretation across replicates.
  • Multi-liquid surface free energy determination using a documented model and known liquid properties (commonly ≥3 and up to 8 probe liquids).
  • Uniformity/heterogeneity assessment via spot-to-spot and drop-to-drop variability (useful for contamination streaks or non-uniform activation).
  • QC-style execution on contact-angle goniometers with suitable measurement range and SFE modeling software (e.g., Dropometer-style workflows that support common SFE models such as Equation-of-State, Fowkes, and Oss–Good).
Out of scope
  • Direct bond strength / durability testing (lap shear, peel, wedge, fatigue, environmental aging) — these require separate mechanical test standards.
  • Universal pass/fail criteria for “good bonding” — EN 828 provides the method, not a single acceptance threshold that applies to all adhesive systems.
  • Dynamic wetting methods (advancing/receding angles, hysteresis) unless you apply other standards specifically covering dynamic angles.
  • Identifying surface chemistry/roughness root cause directly (e.g., spectroscopy, profilometry) — EN 828 reports wettability outcomes, not chemical composition.

Minimum you must report (checklist)

  • Substrate description: material, finish (and roughness class if known), coating/primer details, and any surface-treatment method used.
  • Time history: time from cleaning/pretreatment to measurement (and time to bonding if this is a release gate).
  • Probe liquids: identity and count of liquids used, plus the liquid property values used in the SFE calculation.
  • Measurement method: sessile-drop static geometry, droplet volume, and the fixed timestamp used to record θ.
  • Replication plan: number of drops per liquid and the number/locations of measurement spots (map/grid).
  • Contact angle results per liquid: median θ plus a spread metric (IQR or SD), including the number of valid drops used.
  • Data-quality/exclusions: your rule for rejecting droplets (e.g., poor edge/baseline fit, non-axisymmetric drops, obvious contamination) and how many were rejected.
  • Surface free energy result: total SFE (and component terms if used), the specific model used, and the instrument/software version used to compute it.

Note: EN 828 tells you how to measure and calculate wettability/SFE, but it does not define universal “good bonding” thresholds—your limits must be calibrated to your adhesive + substrate + pretreatment and validated against bond tests. Roughness and chemical non-uniformity can bias static angles, so consistent surface prep, replication, and drop-quality QC are essential.

How to interpret results (guardrails)

  • Lower θ at the fixed timepoint generally means better wetting by that probe liquid, but interpret results primarily relative to your validated “golden” reference surface and your internal control limits.
  • High scatter is a first-class signal: large drop-to-drop or spot-to-spot spread often indicates contamination, non-uniform activation, or heterogeneity—don’t average it away; investigate and map it.
  • SFE is best used as a controlled comparative metric: it’s reliable for trending (before/after treatment, lot-to-lot control) only when the liquid set and model are locked in your SOP.
  • Do not treat θ or SFE as a direct bond-strength guarantee: confirm with representative bond tests and track failure mode (adhesive vs cohesive vs interfacial) to set/maintain Green/Yellow/Red release gates.

Maintenant, c’est à votre tour

We hope this guide showed you how to apply surface science in the Construction industry.

Maintenant, nous aimerions vous céder la parole :

Feel free to leave a comment below—we’d love to hear from you.

Laisser une réponse

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont marqués *


Télécharger l’expérience